(Edit: Figures. Three days after I posted an essay, not only have the comics
moved, invalidating thirteen of my links, but for more than a week after, I can't be bothered to change the links. Well, at least deleting one of those included parenthetically isn't too hard. Edit 2: The links should now direct correctly.)
Ah, politics. A subject I
don't particularly like talking about. And yet it's practically unavoidable when talking about the work of one
rhjunior.
Mr. Hayes, as you may know, has three webcomics:
Nip & Tuck,
Goblin Hollow (formerly "Under the Lemon Tree"), and
Tales of the Questor. The first two are frequently conservative in their view; the third, not so much. I bring this up because the current story in "Nip & Tuck" has a somewhat different direction.
A bit of background: about a year ago, Nip (the brother without the hat) was hired to be the lead of a movie nearly sight unseen (on both ends-- the director
didn't put much thought into the selection, and the actors don't see more than a few pages at a time). Some weeks into the filming, Nip gets his hands on a director's copy of the script and discovers the movie is an
offensively, flamingly liberal piece of garbage.
(An aside here: this movie idea is obviously based off of "Syriana," the only movie I truly regret not walking out on. I have managed to walk out on "The 40-Year-Old Virgin" and "What the Bleep Do We Know!?" because I didn't care for the central concepts. As for "Syriana," the plot didn't make any sense. Hey
Mr. Gaghan! You're supposed to connect everything
before it's more than the audience can handle! I mean, "You're the Canadian"? What the #$*!!?)
Anyway, unable to
escape the movie, he hatches a cunning scheme to
completely hijack it. The result is a movie poised
at the opposite political extreme that parallels George W.'s war in Iraq rather nicely. So, politics.
In fast-forwarding to today (mid-July 2006, actually), we see that Purloined Letter, the guys credited with that revamped film,
has a new movie out-- sci-fi, hyperdrive, evil empire, and such. The premise is that a resistance against the oppressive Interstellar Federation has just lost a war thereagainst, and the rebels have been taken back into the IF
in an uncomfortable manner (also click next). Among the space battles, we see that plenty of just-plain-folks
have been unfairly affected by the war. It's clear, by the way, that we're supposed to sympathize with these characters, the lead and the kiddie sidekick.
"Rebel Cry" strikes me as considerably more liberal than "Man on the Border" for coming out against that war, but then, something similar has been said about "The Phantom Menace." So what's going on here? Is the story (an unabashed
B-movie) generic enough that it slipped under Ralph's radar? Does he have some twists that will drive me away? Do I just not understand politics? What?